Mutation Accumulation in an Asexual Relative of Arabidopsis

Asexual populations experience weaker responses to natural selection, which causes deleterious mutations to accumulate over time. Additionally, stochastic loss of individuals free of deleterious mutations can lead to an irreversible increase in mutational load in asexuals (the "click" in M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS genetics Vol. 13; no. 1; p. e1006550
Main Authors Lovell, John T., Williamson, Robert J., Wright, Stephen I., McKay, John K., Sharbel, Timothy F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 09.01.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Asexual populations experience weaker responses to natural selection, which causes deleterious mutations to accumulate over time. Additionally, stochastic loss of individuals free of deleterious mutations can lead to an irreversible increase in mutational load in asexuals (the "click" in Muller's Ratchet). Here we report on the genomic divergence and distribution of mutations across eight sympatric pairs of sexual and apomictic (asexual) Boechera (Brassicaceae) genotypes. We show that apomicts harbor a greater number of derived mutations than sympatric sexual genotypes. Furthermore, in phylogenetically constrained sites that are subject to contemporary purifying selection, the ancestral, conserved allele is more likely to be retained in sexuals than apomicts. These results indicate that apomictic lineages accumulate mutations at otherwise conserved sites more often than sexuals, and support the conclusion that deleterious mutation accumulation can be a powerful force in the evolution of asexual higher plants.
Bibliography:new_version
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceptualization: JTL TFS JKM.Data curation: RJW JTL TFS.Formal analysis: RJW SIW JTL.Funding acquisition: JTL TFS SIW.Investigation: JTL RJW SIW JKM TFS.Methodology: SIW RJW JTL.Project administration: JTL RJW SIW JKM TFS.Resources: TFS JKM SIW.Software: RJW SIW JTL.Supervision: TFS SIW JKM.Validation: All JTL RJW SIW JKM TFS.Visualization: JTL.Writing – original draft: JTL RJW SIW JKM TFS.Writing – review & editing: JTL RJW SIW JKM TFS.
Current address: Global Institute for Food Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1553-7404
1553-7390
1553-7404
DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006550