Assessment of the causal relevance of ECG parameters for risk of atrial fibrillation: A mendelian randomisation study

Atrial electrical and structural remodelling in older individuals with cardiovascular risk factors has been associated with changes in surface electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (e.g., prolongation of the PR interval) and higher risks of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it has been difficult to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS medicine Vol. 18; no. 5; p. e1003572
Main Authors Gajendragadkar, Parag Ravindra, Von Ende, Adam, Ibrahim, Maysson, Valdes-Marquez, Elsa, Camm, Christian Fielder, Murgia, Federico, Stiby, Alexander, Casadei, Barbara, Hopewell, Jemma C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 13.05.2021
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Atrial electrical and structural remodelling in older individuals with cardiovascular risk factors has been associated with changes in surface electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (e.g., prolongation of the PR interval) and higher risks of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it has been difficult to establish whether altered ECG parameters are the cause or a consequence of the myocardial substrate leading to AF. This study aimed to examine the potential causal relevance of ECG parameters on risk of AF using mendelian randomisation (MR). Weighted genetic scores explaining lifelong differences in P-wave duration, PR interval, and QT interval were constructed, and associations between these ECG scores and risk of AF were estimated among 278,792 UK Biobank participants (mean age: 57 years at recruitment; 19,132 AF cases). The independent genetic variants contributing to each of the separate ECG scores, and their corresponding weights, were based on published genome-wide association studies. In UK Biobank, genetic scores representing a 5 ms longer P-wave duration or PR interval were significantly associated with lower risks of AF (odds ratio [OR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.96, P = 2 × 10-4 and OR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93-0.96, P = 2 × 10-19, respectively), while longer QT interval was not significantly associated with AF. These effects were independently replicated among a further 17,931 AF cases from the AFGen Consortium. Investigation of potential mechanistic pathways showed that differences in ECG parameters associated with specific ion channel genes had effects on risk of AF consistent with the overall scores, while the overall scores were not associated with changes in left atrial size. Limitations of the study included the inherent assumptions of MR, restriction to individuals of European ancestry, and possible restriction of results to the normal ECG ranges represented in UK Biobank. In UK Biobank, we observed evidence suggesting a causal relationship between lifelong differences in ECG parameters (particularly PR interval) that reflect longer atrial conduction times and a lower risk of AF. These findings, which appear to be independent of atrial size and concomitant cardiovascular comorbidity, support the relevance of varying mechanisms underpinning AF and indicate that more individualised treatment strategies warrant consideration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: PRG, AVE, MI, EVM, CFC, FM, AS and JCH work at the Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, which receives research grants from industry that are governed by University of Oxford contracts that protect its independence, and has a staff policy of not taking personal payments from industry; further details can be found at https://www.ndph.ox.ac.uk/files/about/ndph-independence-of-research-policy-jun-20.pdf. BC is supported by a British Heart Foundation (BHF) personal chair; her research is funded by two BHF Programme Grants, the BHF Centre for Research Excellence and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. She also receives in-kind research support from iRhythm and Roche Diagnostics. JCH is supported by a British Heart Foundation personal Fellowship; her research is also funded by grants from industry held in accordance with the policy detailed above, and the Nuffield Department of Population Health.
These authors should be considered joint senior authors.
ISSN:1549-1676
1549-1277
1549-1676
DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003572