Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

Wild and managed bees are well documented as effective pollinators of global crops of economic importance. However, the contributions by pollinators other than bees have been little explored despite their potential to contribute to crop production and stability in the face of environmental change. N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 1; pp. 146 - 151
Main Authors Rader, Romina, Bartomeus, Ignasi, Garibaldi, Lucas A., Garratt, Michael P. D., Howlett, Brad G., Winfree, Rachael, Cunningham, Saul A., Mayfield, Margaret M., Arthur, Anthony D., Andersson, Georg K. S., Bommarco, Riccardo, Brittain, Claire, Carvalheiro, Luísa G., Chacoff, Natacha P., Entling, Martin H., Foully, Benjamin, Freitas, Breno M., Gemmill-Herren, Barbara, Ghazoul, Jaboury, Griffin, Sean R., Gross, Caroline L., Herbertsson, Lina, Herzog, Felix, Hipólito, Juliana, Jaggar, Sue, Jauker, Frank, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Kleijn, David, Krishnan, Smitha, Lemos, Camila Q., Lindström, Sandra A. M., Mandelik, Yael, Monteiro, Victor M., Nelson, Warrick, Nilsson, Lovisa, Pattemore, David E., de O. Pereira, Natália, Pisanty, Gideon, Potts, Simon G., Reemer, Menno, Rundlöf, Maj, Sheffield, Cory S., Scheper, Jeroen, Schüepp, Christof, Smith, Henrik G., Stanley, Dara A., Stout, Jane C., Szentgyörgyi, Hajnalka, Taki, Hisatomo, Vergara, Carlos H., Viana, Blandina F., Woyciechowski, Michal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 05.01.2016
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Wild and managed bees are well documented as effective pollinators of global crops of economic importance. However, the contributions by pollinators other than bees have been little explored despite their potential to contribute to crop production and stability in the face of environmental change. Non-bee pollinators include flies, beetles, moths, butterflies, wasps, ants, birds, and bats, among others. Here we focus on non-bee insects and synthesize 39 field studies from five continents that directly measured the crop pollination services provided by non-bees, honey bees, and other bees to compare the relative contributions of these taxa. Non-bees performed 25–50% of the total number of flower visits. Although non-bees were less effective pollinators than bees per flower visit, they made more visits; thus these two factors compensated for each other, resulting in pollination services rendered by non-bees that were similar to those provided by bees. In the subset of studies that measured fruit set, fruit set increased with non-bee insect visits independently of bee visitation rates, indicating that non-bee insects provide a unique benefit that is not provided by bees. We also show that non-bee insects are not as reliant as bees on the presence of remnant natural or seminatural habitat in the surrounding landscape. These results strongly suggest that non-bee insect pollinators play a significant role in global crop production and respond differently than bees to landscape structure, probably making their crop pollination services more robust to changes in land use. Non-bee insects provide a valuable service and provide potential insurance against bee population declines.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved October 20, 2015 (received for review August 28, 2015)
Author contributions: R.R. designed and coordinated the study, collated datasets and interpreted analyses, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and is the corresponding and senior author; I.B. assisted with the design of the study, conducted and interpreted analyses (with assistance from L.A.G.), discussed, and revised earlier versions of the manuscript; L.A.G., M.P.D.G., B.G.H., R.W., S.A.C., M.M.M., B.G.-H., and C.S.S. contributed data and discussed and revised earlier versions of the project and manuscript; and A.D.A., G.K.S.A., R.B., C. B., L.G.C., N.P.C., M.H.E., B.F., B.M.F., J.G., S.R.G., C.L.G., L.H., F.H., J.H., S.J., F.J., A.-M.K., D.K., S.K., C.Q.L., S.A.M.L., Y.M., V.M.M., W.N., L.N., D.E.P., N.d.O.P., G.P., S.G.P., M. Reemer, M. Rundlöf, J.S., C.S., H.G.S., D.A.S., J.C.S., H.S., H.T., C.H.V., B.F.V., and M.W. collected and formatted field data, and provided several important corrections to subsequent manuscript drafts.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1517092112