Fluoroless catheter ablation of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in pregnancy: validation of a standard approach in a large multicenter registry

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 41; no. Supplement_2
• Main Authors: Stec, S, Styczkiewicz, K, Sledz, J, Sledz, A, Chrabaszcz, M, Karbarz, D, Wozniak, I, Mlynarczyk, K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.11.2020
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0412

Abstract Background An increasing experience in zero- (ZF) or near-zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation (CA) supports the implementation of early, fluoroless approach for recurrent, symptomatic arrhythmias in pregnancy. Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of CA with a standardized ZF approach during pregnancy. Methods Data were derived from a large prospective multicenter registry (ELEKTRO-RARE-A-CAREgistry). Between 2012 and 2019, more than 2655 CA procedures were performed in women in intention-to-treat using a ZF fluoroscopy approach. The procedures were performer using: 1) femoral access, 2) double-catheter technique, without intracardiac echocardiography, 3) electroanatomic mapping system (Ensite, Abbott, USA) for mapping and navigation, 4) conscious, light sedation. Shared decision making approach was applied, including a pregnancy heart team consultations. Results The study group consisted of 18 pregnant women (mean age: 30.3±5.0 years; range: 19–38 years; mean gestational age during CA: 21.4±9.2 weeks; range: 7–36 weeks). All pregnant women had no overt structural heart disease. Among women in reproductive age, pregnant women referred for ZF-CA approach accounted for approximately 2% of procedures. In the study group, the major indications for CA included: AVNRT (n=10); OAVRT/WPW (n=2); focal idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (n=4), AT (n=1) and AF (n=1). Five women had double substrate for CA. In AF case general anesthesia and transesophageal echocardiography were used to monitor ZF-transseptal puncture and right-sided pulmonary vein isolation. All procedures were successfully completed without fluoroscopy, and without serious maternal or fetal complications. The procedure and ablation application times were 55.0±30.0 min and 394±338 s, respectively. In one patient second procedure for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia was postponed after delivery. Conclusion Implementation of pregnancy heart team and a standard fluoroless protocol for CA in daily electrophysiological practice allowed an early, safe, and effective CA of maternal supraventricular tachycardia and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in pregnancy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None