Injustice Experience Questionnaire, Japanese Version: Cross-Cultural Factor-Structure Comparison and Demographics Associated with Perceived Injustice

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 8; p. e0160567
• Main Authors: Yamada, Keiko, Adachi, Tomonori, Mibu, Akira, Nishigami, Tomohiko, Motoyama, Yasushi, Uematsu, Hironobu, Matsuda, Yoichi, Sato, Hitoaki, Hayashi, Kenichi, Cui, Renzhe, Takao, Yumiko, Shibata, Masahiko, Iso, Hiroyasu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 03.08.2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adaptation; Adult; Aged; Analysis; Anesthesiology; Correlation; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Covariance; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Culture; Demographic variables; Demographics; Demography; Female; Fibromyalgia; Goodness of fit; Hospitals; Humans; Injuries; Injustice; Intensive care; Japan; Japanese language; Language; Legal liability; Liability; Male; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain management; Pain Measurement - methods; Patients; People and Places; Perception; Perceptions; Personal injuries; Physical Sciences; Population; Predictions; Psychometrics - methods; Psychometrics - standards; Public health; Regression analysis; Regression coefficients; Regression models; Reliability aspects; Reliability engineering; Reproducibility of Results; Research and Analysis Methods; Social Justice - psychology; Social Sciences; Structural reliability; Studies; Surveys; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards; Translating; University graduates; Variables; Young Adult; United States > US; Japan
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160567

The Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) assesses injury-related perceived injustice. This study aimed to (1) develop a Japanese version (IEQ-J), (2) examine its factor structure, validity, and reliability, and (3) discover which demographic variable(s) positively contributed to prediction of IEQ-J scores. Data from 71 patients (33 male, 38 female; age = 20+) with injury pain were employed to investigate factor structure by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was examined by Pearson correlation coefficients among the IEQ-J, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Internal consistency was investigated by Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was indicated with intra-class correlations (ICCs) in 42 of 71 patients within four weeks. Relations between demographic variables and IEQ-J scores were examined by covariance analysis and linear regression models. IEQ-J factor structure differed from the original two-factor model. A three-factor model with Severity/irreparability, Blame/unfairness, and Perceived lack of empathy was extracted. The three-factor model showed goodness-of-fit with the data and sufficient reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 for total IEQ-J; ICCs = 0.96). Pearson correlation coefficients among IEQ-J, BPI, and PCS ranged from 0.38 to 0.73. Pain duration over a year (regression coefficient, 11.92, 95%CI; 5.95-17.89) and liability for injury on another (regression coefficient, 12.17, 95%CI; 6.38-17.96) predicted IEQ-J total scores. This study evidenced the IEQ-J's sound psychometric properties. The three-factor model was the latter distinctive in the Japanese version. Pain duration over a year and injury liability by another statistically significantly increased IEQ-J scores.