Assessing Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries

Objectives To explore the differences in assessing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) between transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and test relationships between ultrasound findings and anal incontinence (AI) symptoms. Methods A group of 196 women with a history of va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of ultrasound in medicine Vol. 42; no. 9; pp. 2031 - 2038
Main Authors Zhao, Baihua, Li, Yinbo, Tang, Yingchun, Guo, Yuyang, Yang, Yalin, Wen, Lieming, Dietz, Hans Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To explore the differences in assessing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) between transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and test relationships between ultrasound findings and anal incontinence (AI) symptoms. Methods A group of 196 women with a history of vaginal delivery was recruited. OASI was detected in a set of 5 slices by EAUS and 8 slices by TPUS. OASI grading was performed on TPUS rules and EAUS rules. A “significant sphincter defect” was diagnosed by TPUS and EAUS using “2/3 rules.” Symptoms of AI were determined using the St Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS). Ultrasound findings were compared between the two methods and correlated with symptoms. Results Of 196 women, 29 (14.8%) suffered from AI with a mean SMIS of 12.1 ± 4.5, and 70 (35.7%) women with a mean age of 57 years had suspected OASI on imaging. Twenty‐one (10.7%) “significant defects” were diagnosed by TPUS and 24 (12.2%) by EAUS. OASI Grades on TPUS had good agreement with EAUS rules (k = 0.70, P < .001). Logistic regression analysis showed that OASI Grade on imaging and “significant sphincter defects” seen on both forms of imaging were associated with AI symptoms. The odds ratio was 46 and 38 for “significant defects” on TPUS and EAUS, and 14 and 7 for OASI 3b+ on TPUS and EAUS in predicting AI, respectively. Conclusions “Significant defects” diagnosed by EAUS or TPUS and OASI Grade 3b+ predict AI symptoms. The diagnostic performance of endoanal and exoanal ultrasound (EAUS and TPUS) appear to be very similar.
Bibliography:Hans Peter Dietz has received lecture honoraria, consulting fees, and travel support from GE Medical, Mindray, and Materna Medical. The other authors have no conflict of interest to report.
The authors thank SonoScape Medical Corporation for technical support.
Baihua Zhao and Yinbo Li contributed equally to this study.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.16221