Attentional Mechanisms during the Performance of a Subsecond Timing Task

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 7; p. e0158508
• Main Authors: Toscano-Zapién, Anna L., Velázquez-López, Daniel, Velázquez-Martínez, David N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 28.07.2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis; Attention; Attention (Psychology); Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Biology and Life Sciences; Cognitive ability; Eye movements; Female; Fixation, Ocular; Health aspects; Humans; Hypotheses; Latency; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Memory; Perceptions; Performance indices; Physical Sciences; Physiological aspects; Pupil (Eye); Pupil - physiology; Short-term memory; Social Sciences; Task Performance and Analysis; Time and motion studies; Time Perception; Workloads; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158508

There is evidence that timing processes in the suprasecond scale are modulated by attentional mechanisms; in addition, some studies have shown that attentional mechanisms also affect timing in the subsecond scale. Our aim was to study eye movements and pupil diameter during a temporal bisection task in the subsecond range. Subjects were trained to discriminate anchor intervals of 200 or 800 msec, and were then confronted with intermediate durations. Eye movements revealed that subjects used different cognitive strategies during the bisection timing task. When the stimulus to be timed appeared randomly at a central or 4 peripheral positions on a screen, some subjects choose to maintain their gaze toward the central area while other followed the peripheral placement of the stimulus; some others subjects used both strategies. The time of subjective equality did not differ between subjects who employed different attentional mechanisms. However, differences emerged in the timing variance and attentional indexes (time taken to initial fixation, latency to respond, pupil dilatation and duration and number of fixations to stimulus areas). Timing in the subsecond range seems invariant despite the use of different attentional strategies. Future research should determine whether the selection of attentional mechanisms is related to particular timing tasks or instructions or whether it represents idiosyncratic cognitive "styles".