Temperature effects on incidence of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in the Nordics

We aimed to investigate a hypothesised association between daily mean temperature and the risk of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). For the period of 1 January 2005 until 31 December 2019, we collected daily data on mean temperatures and date of 2995 operations for ATAAD at 10 Nord...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal health action Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 2139340
Main Authors Oudin Åström, Daniel, Bjursten, Henrik, Oudin, Anna, Nozohoor, Shahab, Ahmad, Khalil, Tang, Mariann, Bjurbom, Markus, Hansson, Emma C, Jeppsson, Anders, Holdflod Møller, Christian Joost, Jormalainen, Miko, Juvonen, Tatu, Mennander, Ari, Olsen, Peter S, Olsson, Christian, Ahlsson, Anders, Pan, Emily, Raivio, Peter, Wickbom, Anders, Sjögren, Johan, Geirsson, Arnar, Gudbjartsson, Tomas, Zindovic, Igor
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We aimed to investigate a hypothesised association between daily mean temperature and the risk of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). For the period of 1 January 2005 until 31 December 2019, we collected daily data on mean temperatures and date of 2995 operations for ATAAD at 10 Nordic cities included in the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (NORCAAD) collaboration. Using a two-stage time-series approach, we investigated the association between hot and cold temperatures relative to the optimal temperature and the rate of ATAAD repair in the selected cities. The relative risks (RRs) of cold temperatures (≤−5°C) and hot temperatures (≥21°C) compared to optimal temperature were 1.47 (95% CI: 0.72-2.99) and 1.43 (95% CI: 0.67-3.08), respectively. In line with previous studies, we observed increased risk at cold and hot temperatures. However, the observed associations were not statistically significant, thus only providing weak evidence of an association.
ISSN:1654-9716
1654-9880
1654-9880
DOI:10.1080/16549716.2022.2139340