Performance and Accuracy of Lightweight and Low-Cost GPS Data Loggers According to Antenna Positions, Fix Intervals, Habitats and Animal Movements

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 6; p. e0129271
• Main Authors: Forin-Wiart, Marie-Amélie, Hubert, Pauline, Sirguey, Pascal, Poulle, Marie-Lazarine
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 18.06.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animals; Animals, Wild; Antennas (Electronics); Behavior, Animal - physiology; Caprinae; Collars; Comparative analysis; Ecology, environment; Economic aspects; Ecosystem; Geographic Information Systems; Global positioning systems; GPS; Habitats; Health; Households; Human health and pathology; Infectious diseases; Intervals; Life Sciences; Low cost; Microbiology and Parasitology; Movement; Reproducibility of Results; Satellite navigation systems; Test procedures; Wildlife; Wildlife habitats; Wildlife management; New Zealand; France; United States > US
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129271

Recently developed low-cost Global Positioning System (GPS) data loggers are promising tools for wildlife research because of their affordability for low-budget projects and ability to simultaneously track a greater number of individuals compared with expensive built-in wildlife GPS. However, the reliability of these devices must be carefully examined because they were not developed to track wildlife. This study aimed to assess the performance and accuracy of commercially available GPS data loggers for the first time using the same methods applied to test built-in wildlife GPS. The effects of antenna position, fix interval and habitat on the fix-success rate (FSR) and location error (LE) of CatLog data loggers were investigated in stationary tests, whereas the effects of animal movements on these errors were investigated in motion tests. The units operated well and presented consistent performance and accuracy over time in stationary tests, and the FSR was good for all antenna positions and fix intervals. However, the LE was affected by the GPS antenna and fix interval. Furthermore, completely or partially obstructed habitats reduced the FSR by up to 80% in households and increased the LE. Movement across habitats had no effect on the FSR, whereas forest habitat influenced the LE. Finally, the mean FSR (0.90 ± 0.26) and LE (15.4 ± 10.1 m) values from low-cost GPS data loggers were comparable to those of built-in wildlife GPS collars (71.6% of fixes with LE < 10 m for motion tests), thus confirming their suitability for use in wildlife studies.