High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 12; no. 1; p. e0166299
• Main Authors: Thum, Jacob S., Parsons, Gregory, Whittle, Taylor, Astorino, Todd A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 11.01.2017; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Biology and Life Sciences; Blood levels; Body mass; Care and treatment; Cycles; Design; Exercise; Exercise - physiology; Exercise - psychology; Fatigue; Female; Health aspects; Humans; Kinesiology; Lactic acid; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mens health; Middle Aged; Motivation; Obesity; Oxygen - blood; Oxygen consumption; Oxygen Consumption - physiology; Physical activity; Physical Exertion - physiology; Physical fitness; Physical training; Physiology; Social Sciences; Studies; Training; Women; United States
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166299

Exercise adherence is affected by factors including perceptions of enjoyment, time availability, and intrinsic motivation. Approximately 50% of individuals withdraw from an exercise program within the first 6 mo of initiation, citing lack of time as a main influence. Time efficient exercise such as high intensity interval training (HIIT) may provide an alternative to moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICT) to elicit substantial health benefits. This study examined differences in enjoyment, affect, and perceived exertion between MICT and HIIT. Twelve recreationally active men and women (age = 29.5 ± 10.7 yr, VO2max = 41.4 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min, BMI = 23.1 ± 2.1 kg/m2) initially performed a VO2max test on a cycle ergometer to determine appropriate workloads for subsequent exercise bouts. Each subject returned for two additional exercise trials, performing either HIIT (eight 1 min bouts of cycling at 85% maximal workload (Wmax) with 1 min of active recovery between bouts) or MICT (20 min of cycling at 45% Wmax) in randomized order. During exercise, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), affect, and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were measured. Additionally, the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) was completed after exercise. Results showed higher enjoyment (p = 0.013) in response to HIIT (103.8 ± 9.4) versus MICT (84.2 ± 19.1). Eleven of 12 participants (92%) preferred HIIT to MICT. However, affect was lower (p<0.05) and HR, RPE, and BLa were higher (p<0.05) in HIIT versus MICT. Although HIIT is more physically demanding than MICT, individuals report greater enjoyment due to its time efficiency and constantly changing stimulus. NCT:02981667.