A Bayesian Account of Vocal Adaptation to Pitch-Shifted Auditory Feedback

Motor systems are highly adaptive. Both birds and humans compensate for synthetically induced shifts in the pitch (fundamental frequency) of auditory feedback stemming from their vocalizations. Pitch-shift compensation is partial in the sense that large shifts lead to smaller relative compensatory a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 1; p. e0169795
Main Authors Hahnloser, Richard H R, Narula, Gagan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 30.01.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Motor systems are highly adaptive. Both birds and humans compensate for synthetically induced shifts in the pitch (fundamental frequency) of auditory feedback stemming from their vocalizations. Pitch-shift compensation is partial in the sense that large shifts lead to smaller relative compensatory adjustments of vocal pitch than small shifts. Also, compensation is larger in subjects with high motor variability. To formulate a mechanistic description of these findings, we adapt a Bayesian model of error relevance. We assume that vocal-auditory feedback loops in the brain cope optimally with known sensory and motor variability. Based on measurements of motor variability, optimal compensatory responses in our model provide accurate fits to published experimental data. Optimal compensation correctly predicts sensory acuity, which has been estimated in psychophysical experiments as just-noticeable pitch differences. Our model extends the utility of Bayesian approaches to adaptive vocal behaviors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceptualization: RH.Data curation: RH.Formal analysis: RH GN.Funding acquisition: RH.Investigation: RH.Methodology: RH GN.Project administration: RH.Resources: RH.Software: RH GN.Supervision: RH.Validation: RH GN.Visualization: RH GN.Writing – original draft: RH.Writing – review & editing: RH GN.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169795