A Multifaceted Assessment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Practice and AUA Guideline Adherence

• Published in: Urology practice Vol. 11; no. 6; p. 950
• Main Authors: Welliver, Charles, MacLachlan, Lara S, Riggs, Stephen, Kukreja, Janet Baack, Miles-Thomas, Jennifer
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.11.2024
• ISSN: 2352-0787; 2352-0787
• DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000654

Guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were initially formulated by the AUA to provide evidence-based reasoning for the management and care of men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH. Recommendations for a urinalysis and validated symptom questionnaire (AUA Symptom Score [AUASS]/International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) have been long standing, making these data points a metric for examining guidelines adherence.INTRODUCTIONGuidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were initially formulated by the AUA to provide evidence-based reasoning for the management and care of men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH. Recommendations for a urinalysis and validated symptom questionnaire (AUA Symptom Score [AUASS]/International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) have been long standing, making these data points a metric for examining guidelines adherence.A survey assessed providers' awareness of AUA BPH guidelines and practice patterns, and was sent to a randomly selected portion of the AUA membership. The AUA Quality (AQUA) Registry was queried to assess testing and practice patterns.METHODSA survey assessed providers' awareness of AUA BPH guidelines and practice patterns, and was sent to a randomly selected portion of the AUA membership. The AUA Quality (AQUA) Registry was queried to assess testing and practice patterns.Of 4884 invitations sent, 404 responses were received. Most survey respondents (91.8%) indicate they intend to get a urinalysis at initial evaluation. AQUA data found urinalysis was obtained in only 22.8% of patients. Symptom questionnaire use increased with increasing guideline familiarity, with 95.7% of those who are "extremely familiar" routinely using AUASS/IPSS compared to only 69.4% who are "somewhat familiar" (P < .005). Utilization increased by a factor of 2.7 (P < .005) for each increment in familiarity. The lowest use of AUASS/IPSS was in the group within 5 years of finishing training (P = .069).RESULTSOf 4884 invitations sent, 404 responses were received. Most survey respondents (91.8%) indicate they intend to get a urinalysis at initial evaluation. AQUA data found urinalysis was obtained in only 22.8% of patients. Symptom questionnaire use increased with increasing guideline familiarity, with 95.7% of those who are "extremely familiar" routinely using AUASS/IPSS compared to only 69.4% who are "somewhat familiar" (P < .005). Utilization increased by a factor of 2.7 (P < .005) for each increment in familiarity. The lowest use of AUASS/IPSS was in the group within 5 years of finishing training (P = .069).Discrepancies are noted between our practice survey and AQUA data. The AUASS/IPSS is less commonly used by providers with less guideline familiarity and in providers with the least clinical experience. The intent to obtain urinalysis is high; however, actual testing is unfortunately infrequent. These findings could point toward the need for increasing education of providers with regard to clinical guidelines.CONCLUSIONSDiscrepancies are noted between our practice survey and AQUA data. The AUASS/IPSS is less commonly used by providers with less guideline familiarity and in providers with the least clinical experience. The intent to obtain urinalysis is high; however, actual testing is unfortunately infrequent. These findings could point toward the need for increasing education of providers with regard to clinical guidelines.