Explainability of three-dimensional convolutional neural networks for functional magnetic resonance imaging of Alzheimer’s disease classification based on gradient-weighted class activation mapping
Currently, numerous studies focus on employing fMRI-based deep neural networks to diagnose neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), yet only a handful have provided results regarding explainability. We address this gap by applying several prevalent explainability methods such as grad...
Saved in:
Published in | PLOS ONE Vol. 19; no. 5; p. e0303278 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
21.05.2024
Public Library of Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Currently, numerous studies focus on employing fMRI-based deep neural networks to diagnose neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), yet only a handful have provided results regarding explainability. We address this gap by applying several prevalent explainability methods such as gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) to an fMRI-based 3D-VGG16 network for AD diagnosis to improve the model’s explainability. The aim is to explore the specific Region of Interest (ROI) of brain the model primarily focuses on when making predictions, as well as whether there are differences in these ROIs between AD and normal controls (NCs). First, we utilized multiple resting-state functional activity maps including ALFF, fALFF, ReHo, and VMHC to reduce the complexity of fMRI data, which differed from many studies that utilized raw fMRI data. Compared to methods utilizing raw fMRI data, this manual feature extraction approach may potentially alleviate the model’s burden. Subsequently, 3D-VGG16 were employed for AD classification, where the final fully connected layers were replaced with a Global Average Pooling (GAP) layer, aimed at mitigating overfitting while preserving spatial information within the feature maps. The model achieved a maximum of 96.4% accuracy on the test set. Finally, several 3D CAM methods were employed to interpret the models. In the explainability results of the models with relatively high accuracy, the highlighted ROIs were primarily located in the precuneus and the hippocampus for AD subjects, while the models focused on the entire brain for NC. This supports current research on ROIs involved in AD. We believe that explaining deep learning models would not only provide support for existing research on brain disorders, but also offer important referential recommendations for the study of currently unknown etiologies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wpcontent/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0303278 |