Putting Poverty in Political Context: A Multi-Level Analysis of Adult Poverty across 18 Affluent Democracies

Our study analyzes how political context, embodied by the welfare state and Leftist political actors, shapes individual poverty. Using the Luxembourg Income Study, we conduct a multi-level analysis of working-aged adult poverty across 18 affluent Western democracies. Our index of welfare generosity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial forces Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 271 - 299
Main Authors Brady, David, Fullerton, Andrew S., Cross, Jennifer Moren
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chapel Hill, NC The University of North Carolina Press 01.09.2009
University of North Carolina Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Our study analyzes how political context, embodied by the welfare state and Leftist political actors, shapes individual poverty. Using the Luxembourg Income Study, we conduct a multi-level analysis of working-aged adult poverty across 18 affluent Western democracies. Our index of welfare generosity has a negative effect on poverty net of individual characteristics and structural context. For each standard deviation increase in welfare generosity, the odds of poverty decline by a factor of 2.3. The odds of poverty in the United States (the least generous welfare state) are greater by a factor of 16.6 than a person with identical characteristics in Denmark (the most generous welfare state). Significant interaction effects suggest that welfare generosity reduces the extent to which low education and the number of children increase poverty. Also, welfare generosity reduces poverty among those with low education, single-mother households and young households. We show that Leftist parties and union density reduce the odds of poverty, however their effects channel through the welfare state. Ultimately, poverty is shaped both by individual characteristics and the political context in which the individual resides.
Bibliography:istex:0742338213144D3C035E80718EC9890827C4C069
We thank the Social Forces reviewers and Editor François Nielsen, as well as Tom DiPrete, Thomas Hirschl, Matt Hunt, Denise Kall, Nan Tin and David Reimer for suggestions. We are grateful to Bob Jackson and Emilia Niskanen for extraordinary assistance with the LIS and SAS. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2007 American Sociological Association meeting in New York, NY.
ark:/67375/HXZ-LRJPVGF6-T
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI:10.1353/sof.0.0221