Patients Reliably Return to Work After Shoulder Latarjet Procedure

When we need a bone block, a well-performed open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is a powerful tool. The Latarjet remains the current gold standard for surgical treatment of large anterior glenoid defects and it is projected that performance of Latarjet will continue to increase in the United Sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthroscopy
Main Author Sherman, Nathan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 22.11.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When we need a bone block, a well-performed open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is a powerful tool. The Latarjet remains the current gold standard for surgical treatment of large anterior glenoid defects and it is projected that performance of Latarjet will continue to increase in the United States, while Bankart repair declines. What patients want to know is, "When can I expect to return to work or sport after Latarjet?" Return to work is dictated by occupation. Recent research shows that time to return to work can range from approximately 2 to as long as 8 months, and 89-100% of patients eventually return to work after Latarjet. Return to sport is influenced by the sport and position played.When we need a bone block, a well-performed open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is a powerful tool. The Latarjet remains the current gold standard for surgical treatment of large anterior glenoid defects and it is projected that performance of Latarjet will continue to increase in the United States, while Bankart repair declines. What patients want to know is, "When can I expect to return to work or sport after Latarjet?" Return to work is dictated by occupation. Recent research shows that time to return to work can range from approximately 2 to as long as 8 months, and 89-100% of patients eventually return to work after Latarjet. Return to sport is influenced by the sport and position played.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0749-8063
1526-3231
1526-3231
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.071