Validation of the Swedish Quality Register for Ear Surgery – SwedEar

• Published in: BMC medical informatics and decision making Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 240
• Main Authors: Berglund, Malin, Olaison, Sara, Westman, Eva, Eriksson, P. O, Steger, Lena, Bonnard, Ãsa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Accuracy; Agreements; Biomaterials Science; Biomaterialvetenskap; Chronic otitis; Completeness; Data collection; Ear; Ear surgery; Ears & hearing; Health quality improvement; Mathematical analysis; Medical care; Medical records; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Missing data; Myringoplasty; Otolaryngology; Otology; Patients; Personal identification numbers; Quality control; Quality management; Quality register; Reliability; Response rates; Software; Surgery; Validation; Sweden
• ISSN: 1472-6947; 1472-6947
• DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02340-y

Abstract Background The Swedish Quality Register for Ear Surgery (SwedEar) is a national register monitoring surgical procedures and outcomes of ear surgery to facilitate quality improvement. The value of the register is dependent on the quality of its data. SwedEar has never been validated regarding data quality or missing entries. Therefor, the purpose of this study was to assess coverage, completeness and response rate in the register and validate the physicians’ reported data accuracy. Methods In this validation study, the completeness, response rate and missing registrations were analysed. Data in SwedEar were compared with the yearly collected statistics of otosurgical procedures in The Swedish Otosurgical Society and the comparison of rates between groups was calculated with Fisher’s exact test. Validation of registered data accuracy was performed on every 20 th registered case during a five-year period. Data were reabstracted from medical records and compared with the original registration. Interrater agreement, reliability measures, Cohen’s kappa, Gwet’s AC1 and positive predictive value were calculated. Results SwedEar has a coverage of 100%. The completeness of registered cases was 84% and the response rate was 74%. The validation of data accuracy assessed 13 530 variables, including audiograms. Less than 3% of incorrect or missing variables were identified. For most of the pre- and postoperative variables the Kappa and Gwet´s AC1 results show an almost perfect agreement (> 0.80). For audiogram data the ICC shows an excellent reliability (> 0.9) for all but one value. Conclusion This validation shows that SwedEar has excellent coverage, high completeness, and that the data in the register have almost perfect reliability. The data are suitable for both clinical and research purposes. Further efforts to improve completeness are warranted.