Control of Leafminer Larvae in Cut Chrysanthemum, California, 1985

Abstract The test consisted of 4 treatments in Encinitas CA. Three treatments were composed of 8 weekly applications of Trigard 75WP @ 0.125 lb (AI)/acre, Avid 0.15E @ 0.003 lb (AI)/100 gal oi Evisect 50SP @ 0.5 lb (AI)/100 gal, beginning 16 Sep. The 4th treatment consisted of a weekly application o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInsecticide and acaricide tests Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 380
Main Authors Robb, K. L., Virzi, J. K., Parrella, M. P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.1986
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The test consisted of 4 treatments in Encinitas CA. Three treatments were composed of 8 weekly applications of Trigard 75WP @ 0.125 lb (AI)/acre, Avid 0.15E @ 0.003 lb (AI)/100 gal oi Evisect 50SP @ 0.5 lb (AI)/100 gal, beginning 16 Sep. The 4th treatment consisted of a weekly application of Penncap-M + Pounce on Tues beginning 28 Aug, and a weekly application of Dursban 50WP, beginning 2 Sep. Each replicate consisted of 10,000 ft2 and the test was replicated 4 times. Four days after the 8th application, 5 whole plant samples (var. White Marble) were removed from each treatment/replicate. Samples were evaluated for the number of completed mines/leaf on the upper 2/3 of each plant as an indication of aesthetic injury to marketable foliage.
ISSN:0276-3656
DOI:10.1093/iat/11.1.380a