Benefits of umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping on neonatal outcomes in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background\nOptimum timing of umbilical cord clamping has not been established in preterm infants.\nObjectives\nWe compared the short- and long-term effects of umbilical cord milking (UCM) versus delayed cord clamping (DCC) on infants born at less than 37 weeks of gestation.\nSearch methods\nA syste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLOS ONE Vol. 13; no. 8; p. e0201528
Main Authors 齋藤 誠, Nagano Nobuhiko, Saito Makoto, Sugiura Takahiro, Miyahara Fumiko, Namba Fumihiko, Ota Erika
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 30.08.2018
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background\nOptimum timing of umbilical cord clamping has not been established in preterm infants.\nObjectives\nWe compared the short- and long-term effects of umbilical cord milking (UCM) versus delayed cord clamping (DCC) on infants born at less than 37 weeks of gestation.\nSearch methods\nA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" statement. We searched CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).\nSelection criteria\nWe included individual and clustered RCTs comparing UCM to DCC for infants born before 37 weeks of gestation.\nData collection and analysis\nFour reviewers independently assessed trial quality and eligibility for inclusion.\nMain results\nTwo trials (255 preterm infants, 23 0/7 to 32 6/7 weeks of gestation) were included in the analysis. UCM was associated with fewer intraventricular hemorrhages (IVHs) (two trials, 255 infants; relative risk [RR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 0.98, low quality of evidence) and UCM was an increased proportion of infants with a Bayley score at 2 years of age (two trials, 174 infants; Cognitive: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.26, Language: RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.49, low quality of evidence) compared to DCC.\nConclusions\nUCM wasn't reduced in-hospital mortality and need for transfusion compared to DCC. But our study suggests that UCM may lower the risk of IVH and improve certain neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to DCC in preterm infants.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0201528