Initial experiences using EchoScopy in scanning abdominal diseases

Background and aims: A new type of small handheld ultrasound device that brings greater portability and affordability had been introduced and defined by European Federation of Societies of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) as “EchoScopy”. The current study aimed to assess the image quality...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound
Main Authors Barreiros, AP, Cui, XW, Ignee, A, de Molo, C, Pirri, C, Dietrich, CF
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
German
Published 14.10.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and aims: A new type of small handheld ultrasound device that brings greater portability and affordability had been introduced and defined by European Federation of Societies of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) as “EchoScopy”. The current study aimed to assess the image quality, indications and limitations of a portable pocket “EchoScope” compared with a high-end ultrasound system in abdominal diseases. Methods: 231 consecutive patients were included in this study. Physician A performed ultrasound examinations with a high-end ultrasound system (HEUS), then physician B performed the same ultrasound examination using an EchoScope (Vscan™). In patients with focal lesion, physician B also measured the largest diameters and graded the vascularity by using colour Doppler imaging within the lesion on the same plane with both ultrasound systems. Compared with the excellent image quality using HEUS, the image quality of the EchoScope was graded as good, sufficient or non-sufficient. Results: Out of 231 patients, 167 had focal lesions, 19 patients were found with diffuse pathological findings, six with ascites, six after liver puncture and 33 without any pathological findings. The image quality of the pocket device was considered as being good or sufficient to delineate the pathology in 225/231 (97.4%). The detection rate of the EchoScope for abdominal focal lesion was 162/167 (97.0%), only five superficially located lesions could not be detected. Both systems showed agreement in determination of the best positioning to perform abdominal paracentesis and assessing complications after intervention. Conclusions: Surprisingly the investigated EchoScope displays a sufficient image quality, in some indications such as detection of focal lesions > 20 mm, detection of ascites, hydronephrosis and other pathological findings with comparable results to HEUS. In conclusion, pocket sized EchoScopy devices have a promising future but prospective studies should be performed in the near future to determining clear indications.
ISSN:0172-4614
1438-8782
DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1354888