Role of MDCT in Assessment of Long-term Graft Patency in Female Patients

Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the utility of CT-coronary angiogram (CT-CAG) in assessment of long-term graft patency compared to conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and highlight any gender-specific issues in female post-coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndian Journal of Cardiovascular Disease in Women Vol. 7; pp. 188 - 194
Main Authors Jayananda, Amin Dhanush, Patnaik, Sujata, Rao, Amaresh, Rammurti, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 17.12.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the utility of CT-coronary angiogram (CT-CAG) in assessment of long-term graft patency compared to conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and highlight any gender-specific issues in female post-coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records and images of 30 patients including four female patients who had CABG in the past and underwent both conventional and CT-CAGs were analyzed retrospectively. Results: We studied 30 patients who had CABG in whom both CT-CAG and conventional coronary angiograms were performed. CT-CAG was able to evaluate the grafts better than ICA and was useful even in those which could not be assessed due to technical failure by ICA. There were only four female patients in this series. In first patient, the arterial graft (left internal mammary artery [LIMA]) was patent but distal run off was absent in LAD in CT-CAG images and was reported as poor in conventional coronary angiogram. The second patient had CABG 10 years back. The arterial graft (LIMA) to LAD was patent and there was total block in SVG graft to RCA at proximal anastomotic site. The third patient with hypertension and diabetes also had CABG 10 years back. Both LIMA to LAD and SVG to PDA were patent in her. In last case who had CABG 7 years, two of the three SVG grafts were blocked which were well-demonstrated on CT CAG, including one SVG missed on conventional CAG. Conclusion: CT-CAG is a non-invasive and less cumbersome alternative to conventional CAG for the assessment of grafts long after CABG even in women. The data generated by CT-CAG in post-CABG are as good as the invasive CAG and it has distinct advantage of greater acceptability.
ISSN:2835-4982
2455-7854
DOI:10.25259/mm_ijcdw_475