Are YouTube™ Videos Useful for Patients? An Evaluation of YouTube™ Videos on Zygomatic Implants

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of information provided by YouTube™ videos on zygomatic implants. Material and Method: YouTube™ videos were searched using the keyword "Zygomatic implants". The first 200 videos were analyzed. After exclusion, the remaining 94 videos w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical Records Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. 389 - 395
Main Authors Aktı, Ahmet, Cengiz, Ziya Ozan, Gürses, Gökhan, Kaya, Doğan Ilgaz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 24.09.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of information provided by YouTube™ videos on zygomatic implants. Material and Method: YouTube™ videos were searched using the keyword "Zygomatic implants". The first 200 videos were analyzed. After exclusion, the remaining 94 videos were independently analyzed by two investigators for demographic characteristics and content usefulness. All videos were rated as poor, fair, or excellent based on a usefulness score that assessed the quality and flow of the content. Overall video ratings included duration, views, likes, dislikes, and comments. Video content was analyzed using an 8-point scoring list. All videos were categorized according to their source. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test. For non-normally distributed data, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for between-group comparisons, and post-hoc Dunn's test was used for multiple comparisons. The significance level was set at p
ISSN:2687-4555
2687-4555
DOI:10.37990/medr.1497213