Gender As Social Institution

This article encourages sociologists to study gender as a social institution. Noting that scholars apply the institution concept to highly disparate phenomena, it reviews the history of the concept in twentieth-century sociology The defining characteristic most commonly attributed to social institut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial forces Vol. 82; no. 4; pp. 1249 - 1273
Main Author Martin, Patricia Yancey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chapel Hill, NC The University of North Carolina Press 01.06.2004
University of North Carolina Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI10.1353/sof.2004.0081

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article encourages sociologists to study gender as a social institution. Noting that scholars apply the institution concept to highly disparate phenomena, it reviews the history of the concept in twentieth-century sociology The defining characteristic most commonly attributed to social institution is endurance (or persistence over time) while contemporary uses highlight practices, conflict, identity, power, and change. I identify twelve criteria for deciding whether any phenomenon is a social institution. I conclude that treating gender as an institution will improve gender scholarship and social theory generally, increase awareness of gender's profound sociality, offer a means of linking diverse theoretical and empirical work, and make gender's invisible dynamics and complex intersections with other institutions more apparent and subject to critical analysis and change.
Bibliography:This article is based on my presidential address delivered at the Southern Sociological Society meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana, in March 2003. Portions of it were delivered also at Keele University, Alma College, the College of William and Mary, the University of Mississippi, the College of Charleston, the University of South Alabama, the University of California at Davis, the University of Minnesota, and Trento University. For helping me improve the article, I thank Charles Camic, Judith Lorber, Myra Marx Ferree, Sharon Bird, Vinnie Roscigno, Don Tomaskovic-Devey, and John Reynolds, and for assisting with my talk, I thank John Reynolds and Chardie Baird.
istex:3CAB8AD623E7C7365E0B13B74B866529BCE3A0C6
ark:/67375/HXZ-FLXQ8N81-9
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI:10.1353/sof.2004.0081