Impact of Spatial Soil and Climate Input Data Aggregation on Regional Yield Simulations

We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often gen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. e0151782 - 23
Main Authors Hoffmann, Holger, Zhao, Gang, Asseng, Senthold, Bindi, Marco, Biernath, Christian, Constantin, Julie, Coucheney, Elsa, Dechow, Rene, Doro, Luca, Eckersten, Henrik, Gaiser, Thomas, Grosz, Balázs, Heinlein, Florian, Kassie, Belay T, Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian, Klein, Christian, Kuhnert, Matthias, Lewan, Elisabet, Moriondo, Marco, Nendel, Claas, Priesack, Eckart, Raynal, Helene, Roggero, Pier P, Rötter, Reimund P, Siebert, Stefan, Specka, Xenia, Tao, Fulu, Teixeira, Edmar, Trombi, Giacomo, Wallach, Daniel, Weihermüller, Lutz, Yeluripati, Jagadeesh, Ewert, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 07.04.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often generated via averaging and sampling by area majority. This may bias simulated yields at large scales, varying largely across models. Thus, we evaluated the error associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate data for 14 crop models. Yields of winter wheat and silage maize were simulated under water-limited production conditions. We calculated this error from crop yields simulated at spatial resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Most models showed yields biased by <15% when aggregating only soil data. The relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of most models using aggregated soil data was in the range or larger than the inter-annual or inter-model variability in yields. This error increased further when both climate and soil data were aggregated. Distinct error patterns indicate that the rMAE may be estimated from few soil variables. Illustrating the range of these aggregation effects across models, this study is a first step towards an ex-ante assessment of aggregation errors in large-scale simulations.
Bibliography:Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: HH JC RD HE TG BG KCK MK EL CN HR DW LW FE EP PPR RPR JY SA MB. Performed the experiments: HH GZ CB JC EC LD BG FH BTK KCK CK MK MM HR XS FT ET GT LW. Analyzed the data: HH GZ SS. Wrote the paper: HH.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0151782