The Limits of Rational Choice in the Sociology of Social Movements: The 20 February Movement and the Rif Movement in Morocco

This study critically assesses rational choice theory in the sociology of social movements using Moroccan protest movements as a case study. It also shows how social movement studies evolved from social psychology to rational choice theory, which supposes that individuals decide whether to participa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlMuntaqa Vol. 3; no. 1; pp. 52 - 69
Main Author Naimi, Mohamed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies 2020
Subjects
Collective action
Individualism
Political movements
Political protests
Protest movements
Rational choice theory
Social movements
Social research
Sociology
Unemployment
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study critically assesses rational choice theory in the sociology of social movements using Moroccan protest movements as a case study. It also shows how social movement studies evolved from social psychology to rational choice theory, which supposes that individuals decide whether to participate in any social movement by calculating costs and benefits. By studying the movements of unemployed graduates in Morocco, the paper demonstrates that, despite the theory's ability to interpret some aspects of social movements, it falls short when it comes to explaining symbolically motivated movements. These movements stress self-assertion and immaterial values such as freedom and dignity, as in the case of the 20 February and the Rif movements. As an alternative this study proposes to extend the boundaries of this theory to include the cognitive field through the application of axiological rationality instead of rational choice theory.
ISSN:2616-8073
2616-8073
DOI:10.31430/almuntaqa.3.1.0052