On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective

• Published in: PLoS biology Vol. 17; no. 2; p. e3000151
• Main Authors: Sarabipour, Sarvenaz, Debat, Humberto J, Emmott, Edward, Burgess, Steven J, Schwessinger, Benjamin, Hensel, Zach
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 21.02.2019; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Bibliometrics; Biology; Biomedical engineering; Biomedical Research; Career Mobility; Careers; Computer engineering; Face recognition; Humans; Initiatives; Life sciences; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Open access; Peer review; Peer Review, Research - methods; People and Places; Periodicals as Topic; Preprints as Topic; Professional development; Publishing; Research and Analysis Methods; Research Personnel - psychology; Researchers; Reviews; Science Policy; Social Sciences; Virology; United States; Argentina; Australia; United States > US; Massachusetts
• ISSN: 1545-7885; 1544-9173; 1545-7885
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151

Peer-reviewed journal publication is the main means for academic researchers in the life sciences to create a permanent public record of their work. These publications are also the de facto currency for career progress, with a strong link between journal brand recognition and perceived value. The current peer-review process can lead to long delays between submission and publication, with cycles of rejection, revision, and resubmission causing redundant peer review. This situation creates unique challenges for early career researchers (ECRs), who rely heavily on timely publication of their work to gain recognition for their efforts. Today, ECRs face a changing academic landscape, including the increased interdisciplinarity of life sciences research, expansion of the researcher population, and consequent shifts in employer and funding demands. The publication of preprints, publicly available scientific manuscripts posted on dedicated preprint servers prior to journal-managed peer review, can play a key role in addressing these ECR challenges. Preprinting benefits include rapid dissemination of academic work, open access, establishing priority or concurrence, receiving feedback, and facilitating collaborations. Although there is a growing appreciation for and adoption of preprints, a minority of all articles in life sciences and medicine are preprinted. The current low rate of preprint submissions in life sciences and ECR concerns regarding preprinting need to be addressed. We provide a perspective from an interdisciplinary group of ECRs on the value of preprints and advocate their wide adoption to advance knowledge and facilitate career development.