Pluralité des instruments et des logiques politiques pour l'adaptation aux changements globaux en zone côtière

• Published in: Natures sciences sociétés (Montrouge) Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 407 - 417
• Main Authors: Dhenain, S., Barreteau, Olivier
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: French
• Published: EDP Sciences 2018
• Subjects: Environmental Sciences
• ISSN: 1240-1307; 1765-2979
• DOI: 10.1051/nss/2019005

Since the 2000s, "adaptation" is a new dictate for the management of local territories in France, but its implementation is fairly limited. Adaptation is mainly a semantically unclear and loosely defined concept. Decision-makers could "operationalize" adaptation by simply applying a specific methodology. However, adaptation is not a mere mechanism; it is also a process that implies economic, social and ecological trade-offs for the socio-ecological system. These political dimensions are often unformulated. In order to provide a vehicle to clarify this concept and its political dimensions, we propose a typology of adaptation measures. What does adaptation mean? Adjustment of what (territories, populations, communities, local economies, etc.), to what (climate change, global change) and with what effects? We reviewed local actions and strategic plans related to climate but also to urban planning, flooding and water management on the eastern coastal area of Languedoc Roussillon in Mediterranean France. We conducted and analyzed semi-structured interviews with institutional actors. We analyzed and classified public policy instruments, associated the underlying "logic" (raise limiting factors, create a new awareness, etc.), and their potential effects. Throughout our effort to develop a typology, we have highlighted the political dimensions of adaptation actions and shed a light on trade-offs linked to adaptation choices.