Propensity or diversity? Investigating how mind wandering influences the incubation effect of creativity

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 4; p. e0267187
• Main Authors: Teng, Shan-Chuan, Lien, Yunn-Wen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 29.04.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Attention; Biology and Life Sciences; Consciousness; Creative ability; Creativity; Flexibility; Humans; Hypotheses; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mindfulness; People and Places; Psychological aspects; Respiration; Social Sciences; Treatment Refusal; Taiwan
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267187

Mind wandering has been argued to be beneficial for breaking through mental impasses, which leads to better creative performance upon a second attempt (i.e., the incubation effect). However, the evidence is inconsistent. Different from the propensity for mind wandering that has been the focus of past studies, in this study we further examined the role of diversity (i.e., non-repetitiveness of mind wandering respective to its content) and types of mind wandering along the dimensions of intentionality and awareness during incubation when engaging in a 0-back task (a mind wandering-prone condition) and a focused-breathing practice (a mindfulness-induced condition). We proposed that diversity rather than the propensity for mind wandering was crucial for post-incubation divergent creativity and that mindfulness induction would be a more effective way to elicit the incubation effect because it should result in fewer but more diverse mind-wandering incidents than engaging in a mind wandering-prone task. We conducted an experiment with a between-participant variable (incubation tasks: mind wandering-prone, mindfulness-induced, and no incubation). As predicted, the mindfulness-induced group (N = 30) outperformed the control group (N = 31) on flexibility for the unusual uses task measuring divergent thinking after incubation, but the mind wandering-prone group (N = 29) did not outperform the control group. In addition, the diversity of mind wandering and the tendency toward intentional mind wandering predicted the magnitude of incubation effects on flexibility and originality, respectively. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.