Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services

Assessing global tendencies and impacts of conditional payments for environmental services (PES) programs is challenging because of their heterogeneity, and scarcity of comparative studies. This meta-study systematizes 55 PES schemes worldwide in a quantitative database. Using categorical principal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 3; p. e0149847
Main Authors Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss, Wunder, Sven, Ruiz-Pérez, Manuel, Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio Del Pilar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 03.03.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Assessing global tendencies and impacts of conditional payments for environmental services (PES) programs is challenging because of their heterogeneity, and scarcity of comparative studies. This meta-study systematizes 55 PES schemes worldwide in a quantitative database. Using categorical principal component analysis to highlight clustering patterns, we reconfirm frequently hypothesized differences between public and private PES schemes, but also identify diverging patterns between commercial and non-commercial private PES vis-à-vis their service focus, area size, and market orientation. When do these PES schemes likely achieve significant environmental additionality? Using binary logistical regression, we find additionality to be positively influenced by three theoretically recommended PES 'best design' features: spatial targeting, payment differentiation, and strong conditionality, alongside some contextual controls (activity paid for and implementation time elapsed). Our results thus stress the preeminence of customized design over operational characteristics when assessing what determines the outcomes of PES implementation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: DEB SW MRP. Performed the experiments: DEB SW MRP. Analyzed the data: DEB SW MRP RPMS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DEB SW. Wrote the paper: DEB SW MRP RPMS.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149847