The Effect of Sampling and Storage on the Fecal Microbiota Composition in Healthy and Diseased Subjects

Large-scale cohort studies are currently being designed to investigate the human microbiome in health and disease. Adequate sampling strategies are required to limit bias due to shifts in microbial communities during sampling and storage. Therefore, we examined the impact of different sampling and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 10; no. 5; p. e0126685
Main Authors Tedjo, Danyta I., Jonkers, Daisy M. A. E., Savelkoul, Paul H., Masclee, Ad A., van Best, Niels, Pierik, Marieke J., Penders, John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 29.05.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Large-scale cohort studies are currently being designed to investigate the human microbiome in health and disease. Adequate sampling strategies are required to limit bias due to shifts in microbial communities during sampling and storage. Therefore, we examined the impact of different sampling and storage conditions on the stability of fecal microbial communities in healthy and diseased subjects. Fecal samples from 10 healthy controls, 10 irritable bowel syndrome and 8 inflammatory bowel disease patients were collected on site, aliquoted immediately after defecation and stored at -80 °C, -20 °C for 1 week, at +4°C or room temperature for 24 hours. Fecal transport swabs (FecalSwab, Copan) were collected and stored for 48-72 hours at room temperature. We used pyrosequencing of the 16S gene to investigate the stability of microbial communities. Alpha diversity did not differ between all storage methods and -80 °C, except for the fecal swabs. UPGMA clustering and principal coordinate analysis showed significant clustering by test subject (p < 0.001) but not by storage method. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and (un)weighted UniFrac showed a significant higher distance between fecal swabs and -80 °C versus the other methods and -80 °C samples (p < 0.009). The relative abundance of Ruminococcus and Enterobacteriaceae did not differ between the storage methods versus -80 °C, but was higher in fecal swabs (p < 0.05). Storage up to 24 hours (at +4 °C or room temperature) or freezing at -20 °C did not significantly alter the fecal microbial community structure compared to direct freezing of samples from healthy subjects and patients with gastrointestinal disorders.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: A. Masclee receives grants from DSM, Grunenthal, Abott and Danone. M. Pierik acted as a consultant for Takeda in the past and was a former lecturer for Abbvie, Falk, MSD and Ferning. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Conceived and designed the experiments: JP DT DJ MP AM PS. Performed the experiments: DT NB. Analyzed the data: DT JP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DJ MP. Wrote the paper: DT DJ JP. Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content: DT DJ AM PS MP JP. Final approval of the version to be published: DT DJ AM PS MP NB JP.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126685