So far so good: emotion in the peripersonal/extrapersonal space

Current accounts of spatial cognition and human-object interaction suggest that the representation of peripersonal space depends on an action-specific system that remaps its representation according to action requirements. Here we demonstrate that this mechanism is sensitive to knowledge about prope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 7; no. 11; p. e49162
Main Authors Valdés-Conroy, Berenice, Román, Francisco J, Hinojosa, Jose A, Shorkey, S Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 21.11.2012
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Current accounts of spatial cognition and human-object interaction suggest that the representation of peripersonal space depends on an action-specific system that remaps its representation according to action requirements. Here we demonstrate that this mechanism is sensitive to knowledge about properties of objects. In two experiments we explored the interaction between physical distance and object attributes (functionality, desirability, graspability, etc.) through a reaching estimation task in which participants indicated if objects were near enough to be reached. Using both a real and a cutting-edge digital scenario, we demonstrate that perceived reaching distance is influenced by ease of grasp and the affective valence of an object. Objects with a positive affective valence tend to be perceived reachable at locations at which neutral or negative objects are perceived as non-reachable. In addition to this, reaction time to distant (non-reachable) positive objects suggests a bias to perceive positive objects as closer than negative and neutral objects (exp. 2). These results highlight the importance of the affective valence of objects in the action-specific mapping of the peripersonal/extrapersonal space system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: BVC SPS FJR JAH. Performed the experiments: SPS FJR BVC. Analyzed the data: BVC FJR SPS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BVC FJR JAH SPS. Wrote the paper: BVC. Reviewed the manuscript: BVC FJR JAH SPS.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0049162