Evolutionary Comparison of Two Combinatorial Regulators of SBP-Box Genes, MiR156 and MiR529, in Plants

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e0124621
• Main Authors: Zhang, Shu-Dong, Ling, Li-Zhen, Zhang, Quan-Fang, Xu, Jian-Di, Cheng, Le
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 24.04.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Arabidopsis; Binding sites; Biological evolution; Brachypodium distachyon; Combinatorial analysis; Comparative analysis; Conservation; Conserved Sequence; Contraction; Deactivation; Divergence; Evolution; Evolution (Biology); Evolution, Molecular; Evolutionary genetics; Gene Deletion; Gene Duplication; Gene expression; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; Genes; Genes, Plant; Genomes; Genomics; Inactivation; Kinases; MicroRNA; MicroRNAs; MicroRNAs - chemistry; MicroRNAs - genetics; miRNA; Nucleic Acid Conformation; Oryza; Oryza - genetics; Oryza sativa; Plants - genetics; Polymorphism; Protein binding; Protein structure; Proteins; Regulators; Reproduction (copying); Rice; RNA Precursors; RNA Stability; Secondary structure; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Structural stability; Taxonomy; China
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124621

A complete picture of the evolution of miRNA combinatorial regulation requires the synthesis of information on all miRNAs and their targets. MiR156 and miR529 are two combinatorial regulators of squamosa promoter binding protein-like (SBP-box) genes. Previous studies have clarified the evolutionary dynamics of their targets; however, there have been no reports on the evolutionary patterns of two miRNA regulators themselves to date. In this study, we investigated the evolutionary differences between these two miRNA families in extant land plants. Our work found that miR529 precursor, especially of its mature miRNA sequence, has a higher evolutionary rate. Such accelerating evolution of miR529 has significantly effects on its structural stability, and sequence conservation against existence of itself. By contrast, miR156 evolves more rapidly in loop region of the stable secondary structure, which may contribute to its functional diversity. Moreover, miR156 and miR529 genes have distinct rates of loss after identical duplication events. MiR529 genes have a higher average loss rate and asymmetric loss rate in duplicated gene pairs, indicating preferred miR529 gene losses become another predominant mode of inactivation, that are implicated in the contraction of this family. On the contrary, duplicated miR156 genes have a low loss rate, and could serve as another new source for functional diversity. Taken together, these results provide better insight into understanding the evolutionary divergence of miR156 and miR529 family in miRNA combinational regulation network.