Functional Visual Acuity of Early Presbyopia

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 3; p. e0151094
• Main Authors: Katada, Yusaku, Negishi, Kazuno, Watanabe, Kazuhiro, Shigeno, Yuta, Saiki, Megumi, Torii, Hidemasa, Kaido, Minako, Tsubota, Kazuo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 09.03.2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Accommodation, Ocular - physiology; Acuity; Adult; Age differences; Aging; Analysis; Astigmatism; Biology and Life Sciences; Cataracts; Development and progression; Eye (anatomy); Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Measurement; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; People and Places; Physical Sciences; Presbyopia; Presbyopia - physiopathology; Refraction, Ocular - physiology; Regression analysis; Regression models; Research and Analysis Methods; Social Sciences; Tearing; Test procedures; Vision Tests; Visual acuity; Visual Acuity - physiology; Visual perception; Young Adult; Japan
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151094

To evaluate visual function in patients with early presbyopia using the functional visual acuity (FVA) test. This study included 27 eyes of 27 healthy older volunteers (mean age, 44.1 ± 2.6 years) and 14 eyes of 14 healthy young volunteers (mean age, 28.4±4.8 years). The distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), distance-corrected near VA (DCNVA), subjective amplitude of accommodation (AA), and distance and near pupillary diameters were measured. The distance FVA and distance-corrected near FVA (DCNFVA) were measured using the FVA Measurement System. The standard Schirmer test and standard tear break-up time measurement also were performed. The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) DCVA was better than 0 in all subjects. The percentages of subjects with logMAR DCNVA below 0 was significantly lower in the presbyopia group than in the young group. The DCNFVA in the presbyopia group was significantly (P < 0.001) poorer than the DCNVA in that group. Significant linear negative correlations were seen between the DCNVA and AA (r = -0.507, P < 0.001) and the DCNFVA and AA (r = -0.681, P < 0.001) in the older subjects. Stepwise regression analysis showed that only the AA was a significant factor predictive of the DCNFVA in the presbyopia group. Tear function parameters were not adopted in the regression model. Measurement of the DCNFVA can detect decreased AA in early presbyopia better than measurement of the conventional near VA. The DCNFVA is a good index for early presbyopia.