Harmonic Scalpel versus Electrocautery Dissection in Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 11; p. e0142271
• Main Authors: Huang, Jinbo, Yu, Yinghua, Wei, Changyuan, Qin, Qinghong, Mo, Qinguo, Yang, Weiping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 06.11.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Blood; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Breasts; Cancer; Care and treatment; Clinical trials; Complications; Confidence intervals; Development and progression; Dissection; Dissection - adverse effects; Dissection - instrumentation; Electrocoagulation; Electrocoagulation - adverse effects; Electrocoagulation - instrumentation; Health aspects; Humans; Mastectomy; Mastectomy, Modified Radical - adverse effects; Mastectomy, Modified Radical - instrumentation; Meta-analysis; Morbidity; Patient outcomes; Plastic surgery; Studies; Surgery; Surgical instruments; Wounds; United States
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142271

Despite the common use of conventional electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, the harmonic scalpel is recently emerging as a dominant surgical instrument for dissection and haemostasis, which is thought to reduce the morbidity, such as seroma and blood loss. But the results of published trials are inconsistent. So we made the meta-analysis to assess the intraoperative and postoperative endpoints among women undergoing modified radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel or electrocautery. A comprehensive literature search of case-control studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases involving modified radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel or electrocautery was performed. We carried out a meta-analysis of primary endpoints including postoperative drainage, seroma development, intraoperative blood loss and secondly endpoints including operative time and wound complications. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the effect size for categorical outcomes and standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes. A total of 11 studies with 702 patients were included for this meta-analysis. There was significant difference in total postoperative drainage (SMD: -0.74 [95%CI: -1.31, -0.16]; P< 0.01), seroma development[OR: 0.49 (0.34, 0.70); P < 0.01], intraoperative blood loss(SMD: -1.14 [95%CI: -1.81,-0.47]; P < 0.01) and wound complications [OR: 0.38 (0.24, 0.59); P < 0.01] between harmonic scalpel dissection and standard electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. No difference was found as for operative time between harmonic scalpel dissection and standard electrocautery (SMD: 0.04 [95%CI: -0.41, 0.50]; P = 0.85). Compared to standard electrocautery, harmonic scalpel dissection presents significant advantages in decreasing postoperative drainage, seroma development, intraoperative blood loss and wound complications in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, without increasing operative time. Harmonic scalpel can be recommended as a preferential surgical instrument in modified radical mastectomy.