Perceiving Object Shape from Specular Highlight Deformation, Boundary Contour Deformation, and Active Haptic Manipulation

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 2; p. e0149058
• Main Authors: Norman, J Farley, Phillips, Flip, Cheeseman, Jacob R, Thomason, Kelsey E, Ronning, Cecilia, Behari, Kriti, Kleinman, Kayla, Calloway, Autum B, Lamirande, Davora
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 10.02.2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Biology and Life Sciences; Brain research; Computer and Information Sciences; Computer Graphics; Computers; Contours; Deformation; Depth Perception; Discrimination (Psychology); Engineering; Form Perception; Humans; Identification; Kinetics; Medicine and Health Sciences; Motion; Motion detection; Neurosciences; Object motion; Pattern Recognition, Visual; Peppers; Perception; Physical Sciences; Physiological aspects; Psychology; Reaction Time; Recognition (Psychology); Science; Social Sciences; Space perception; Surface layers; Tactile stimuli; Texture; Touch; Visual Perception; Visual tasks; Young Adult; United States; New York; United States > US; Kentucky
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149058

It is well known that motion facilitates the visual perception of solid object shape, particularly when surface texture or other identifiable features (e.g., corners) are present. Conventional models of structure-from-motion require the presence of texture or identifiable object features in order to recover 3-D structure. Is the facilitation in 3-D shape perception similar in magnitude when surface texture is absent? On any given trial in the current experiments, participants were presented with a single randomly-selected solid object (bell pepper or randomly-shaped "glaven") for 12 seconds and were required to indicate which of 12 (for bell peppers) or 8 (for glavens) simultaneously visible objects possessed the same shape. The initial single object's shape was defined either by boundary contours alone (i.e., presented as a silhouette), specular highlights alone, specular highlights combined with boundary contours, or texture. In addition, there was a haptic condition: in this condition, the participants haptically explored with both hands (but could not see) the initial single object for 12 seconds; they then performed the same shape-matching task used in the visual conditions. For both the visual and haptic conditions, motion (rotation in depth or active object manipulation) was present in half of the trials and was not present for the remaining trials. The effect of motion was quantitatively similar for all of the visual and haptic conditions-e.g., the participants' performance in Experiment 1 was 93.5 percent higher in the motion or active haptic manipulation conditions (when compared to the static conditions). The current results demonstrate that deforming specular highlights or boundary contours facilitate 3-D shape perception as much as the motion of objects that possess texture. The current results also indicate that the improvement with motion that occurs for haptics is similar in magnitude to that which occurs for vision.