Combined EEG/MEG can outperform single modality EEG or MEG source reconstruction in presurgical epilepsy diagnosis

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 3; p. e0118753
• Main Authors: Aydin, Ümit, Vorwerk, Johannes, Dümpelmann, Matthias, Küpper, Philipp, Kugel, Harald, Heers, Marcel, Wellmer, Jörg, Kellinghaus, Christoph, Haueisen, Jens, Rampp, Stefan, Stefan, Hermann, Wolters, Carsten H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 11.03.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Action Potentials; Adolescent; Anisotropy; Biomedical engineering; Brain Mapping; Care and treatment; Center of gravity; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology; Conductivity; Diagnosis; EEG; Electric properties; Electrodes; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Epilepsy - diagnosis; Epilepsy - physiopathology; Epilepsy - surgery; Female; Finite element method; Gradiometers; Humans; Informatics; Localization; Magnetic measurement; Magnetoencephalography; Medical diagnosis; Neurology; Noise reduction; Preoperative Period; Propagation; Reconstruction; Risk factors; Studies; Substantia alba; Surgery
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118753

We investigated two important means for improving source reconstruction in presurgical epilepsy diagnosis. The first investigation is about the optimal choice of the number of epileptic spikes in averaging to (1) sufficiently reduce the noise bias for an accurate determination of the center of gravity of the epileptic activity and (2) still get an estimation of the extent of the irritative zone. The second study focuses on the differences in single modality EEG (80-electrodes) or MEG (275-gradiometers) and especially on the benefits of combined EEG/MEG (EMEG) source analysis. Both investigations were validated with simultaneous stereo-EEG (sEEG) (167-contacts) and low-density EEG (ldEEG) (21-electrodes). To account for the different sensitivity profiles of EEG and MEG, we constructed a six-compartment finite element head model with anisotropic white matter conductivity, and calibrated the skull conductivity via somatosensory evoked responses. Our results show that, unlike single modality EEG or MEG, combined EMEG uses the complementary information of both modalities and thereby allows accurate source reconstructions also at early instants in time (epileptic spike onset), i.e., time points with low SNR, which are not yet subject to propagation and thus supposed to be closer to the origin of the epileptic activity. EMEG is furthermore able to reveal the propagation pathway at later time points in agreement with sEEG, while EEG or MEG alone reconstructed only parts of it. Subaveraging provides important and accurate information about both the center of gravity and the extent of the epileptogenic tissue that neither single nor grand-averaged spike localizations can supply.