Indications of airway stenting for severe central airway obstruction due to advanced cancer
Management of severe central airway obstruction due to advanced cancer is a medical and technical challenge. The impact of airway stenting on the clinical outcome of such patients is unclear. This single-center, retrospective study evaluated 21 patients who underwent airway stenting for advanced can...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 12; no. 6; p. e0179795 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
26.06.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Management of severe central airway obstruction due to advanced cancer is a medical and technical challenge. The impact of airway stenting on the clinical outcome of such patients is unclear.
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated 21 patients who underwent airway stenting for advanced cancer. We examined predictors of the post-stenting mortality, including age, serum albumin, tracheal diameter, smoking, opioid use, respiratory failure, and performance status (PS). We also compared survival according to the PS.
The mean survival period after stenting was 85.2 days. On univariate analysis, age, albumin, PS before airway stenting, respiratory failure, admission route, and PS grade were the candidates as possible predictors of prognosis after the procedure. On multivariate analysis, PS before airway stenting was identified as possible predictor of prognosis after stenting (HR 1.6180, 95% CI 0.969 to 2.7015, p = 0.066). The mean survival period after stenting was significantly longer in the good PS group, compared to the poor PS group (147.8 days vs. 38.2 days,p = 0.0346).
Airway stenting for advanced cancer may be more effective for patients in good general condition than in those with poor performance status. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conceptualization: HN TK.Data curation: HN TK.Formal analysis: HN TK.Investigation: HN SY YN HT.Methodology: HN TK.Project administration: HN TK.Resources: HN TK.Software: HN TK.Supervision: HN TK.Visualization: HN.Writing – original draft: HN.Writing – review & editing: HN TK SY YN HT. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. These authors also contributed equally to this work. Current address: 281 Miyazato, Uruma-City, Okinawa Pref, Japan |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0179795 |