Impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to second-hand smoke and respiratory health in hospitality workers: a cohort study

A smoke-free law came into effect in Spain on 1st January 2006, affecting all enclosed workplaces except hospitality venues, whose proprietors can choose among totally a smoke-free policy, a partial restriction with designated smoking areas, or no restriction on smoking on the premises. We aimed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 4; no. 1; p. e4244
Main Authors Fernández, Esteve, Fu, Marcela, Pascual, José A, López, María J, Pérez-Ríos, Mónica, Schiaffino, Anna, Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M, Ariza, Carles, Saltó, Esteve, Nebot, Manel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 23.01.2009
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A smoke-free law came into effect in Spain on 1st January 2006, affecting all enclosed workplaces except hospitality venues, whose proprietors can choose among totally a smoke-free policy, a partial restriction with designated smoking areas, or no restriction on smoking on the premises. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the law among hospitality workers by assessing second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure and the frequency of respiratory symptoms before and one year after the ban. We formed a baseline cohort of 431 hospitality workers in Spain and 45 workers in Portugal and Andorra. Of them, 318 (66.8%) were successfully followed up 12 months after the ban, and 137 nonsmokers were included in this analysis. We obtained self-reported exposure to SHS and the presence of respiratory symptoms, and collected saliva samples for cotinine measurement. Salivary cotinine decreased by 55.6% after the ban among nonsmoker workers in venues where smoking was totally prohibited (from median of 1.6 ng/ml before to 0.5 ng/ml, p<0.01). Cotinine concentration decreased by 27.6% (p = 0.068) among workers in venues with designated smoking areas, and by 10.7% (p = 0.475) among workers in venues where smoking was allowed. In Portugal and Andorra, no differences between cotinine concentration were found before (1.2 ng/ml) and after the ban (1.2 ng/ml). In Spain, reported respiratory symptom declined significantly (by 71.9%; p<0.05) among workers in venues that became smoke-free. After adjustment for potential confounders, salivary cotinine and respiratory symptoms decreased significantly among workers in Spanish hospitality venues where smoking was totally banned. Among nonsmoker hospitality workers in bars and restaurants where smoking was allowed, exposure to SHS after the ban remained similar to pre-law levels. The partial restrictions on smoking in Spanish hospitality venues do not sufficiently protect hospitality workers against SHS or its consequences for respiratory health.
Bibliography:Conceived and designed the experiments: EF MJL MPR AS CA ES MN. Performed the experiments: JAP. Analyzed the data: EF MF JAP AS JMMS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MF JAP MJL ES. Wrote the paper: EF MF JAP MJL MPR AS JMMS CA ES MN. Co-ordinated participant recruitment, data collection and data management: EF MF. Wrote the first version of the paper: EF. Guarantoor: EF. Assisted with participant recruitment and data collection, in collaboration with study co-ordinators and field workers in each region: MF MJL MPR AS. Participated in the interpretation of results: MF JAP MJL MPR AS JMMS CA ES MN. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: MF JAP ES MN. Participated in the study design: JAP MJL MPR AS. Responsible for cotinine analyses, in collaboration with Raúl Pérez: JAP. Contributed to the critical review of the manuscript: JAP MPR AS JMMS CA. Contributed to revision of the manuscript: JAP MPR AS JMMS CA ES MN. Performed statistical analyses: JMMS.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0004244