Labor Markets, Delinquency, and Social Control Theory: An Empirical Assessment of the Mediating Process

The emerging labor market stratification and crime perspective has drawn on dual labor market theory and social control theory to examine the influence of labor market stratification and resulting job characteristics on criminal behavior. With empirical studies finding consistent support for this re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial forces Vol. 78; no. 3; pp. 1041 - 1066
Main Author Wadsworth, Tim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chapel Hill, NC The University of North Carolina Press 01.03.2000
University of North Carolina Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI10.1093/sf/78.3.1041

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The emerging labor market stratification and crime perspective has drawn on dual labor market theory and social control theory to examine the influence of labor market stratification and resulting job characteristics on criminal behavior. With empirical studies finding consistent support for this relationship, it has been suggested that parents' work experience may also influence their children's law-violating behavior. Using data from the National Survey of Families and Households, the current research examines whether parents' job characteristics, indicative of the primary- and secondary-sector labor market division, influence children's bonds to conformity and resulting levels of delinquency. The findings suggest that parents' job characteristics have significant effects on levels of parental supervision, children's feelings of attachment and efficacy, as well as educational aspirations and grade point averages, all of which directly or indirectly affect levels of delinquency.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-4N97Q9ZB-J
istex:4E273CABE7EF4FE8BCD964E4B2277D7B723AF61C
Special thanks to Robert Crutchfield, Avery Guest, Paul Lepore, George Bridges, Herb Costner, and the members of the University of Washington Deviance and Social Control Seminar, as well as the two anonymous Social Forces reviewers, for comments on earlier drafts of the article.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI:10.1093/sf/78.3.1041