Extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of acute and chronic graft‐versus‐host disease in adults and children: best practice recommendations from an I talian S ociety of H emapheresis and C ell M anipulation ( SIdEM ) and I talian G roup for B one M arrow T ransplantation ( GITMO ) consensus process

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis ( ECP ) is an effective treatment for both acute and chronic graft‐versus‐host disease ( GVHD ) in children and adults. Despite the large use of this treatment, a large heterogeneity in current application of ECP has been reported so far and recent evidence br...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 53; no. 10; pp. 2340 - 2352
Main Authors Pierelli, Luca, Perseghin, Paolo, Marchetti, Monia, Messina, Chiara, Perotti, Cesare, Mazzoni, Alessandro, Bacigalupo, Andrea, Locatelli, Franco, Carlier, Paolo, Bosi, Alberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.10.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Extracorporeal photopheresis ( ECP ) is an effective treatment for both acute and chronic graft‐versus‐host disease ( GVHD ) in children and adults. Despite the large use of this treatment, a large heterogeneity in current application of ECP has been reported so far and recent evidence brought novel issues into some specific topics. Consensus‐based recommendations ameliorate the appropriateness in daily clinical practice and, in turn, optimize the use of health care resources. Study Design and Methods Two I talian scientific societies, the I talian S ociety of H emapheresis and C ell M anipulation ( SIdEM ) and the I talian G roup for B one M arrow T ransplantation ( GITMO ), joined to develop and disseminate recommendations on appropriate application of ECP treatment in patients with GVHD . Accordingly, SIdEM and GITMO named an expert panel that first selected 16 questions that were considered relevant for clinical practice: the questions were subsequently addressed through a revision of the available literature and in consensus meetings. The whole group discussed the proposed recommendations according to the nominal group technique. Results The above‐described approach in turn allowed the panel to agree on 47 practice recommendations. SIdEM and GITMO will disseminate such recommendations to the national transplant centers. Conclusion In conclusion, SIdEM and GITMO have made a scientific effort to provide a useful tool to physicians involved in the field, thus supporting daily clinical practice, as well as strategic decisions in the setting of ECP treatment of GVHD .
ISSN:0041-1132
1537-2995
DOI:10.1111/trf.12059