Effects of head tilt on visual field testing with a head-mounted perimeter imo

A newly developed head-mounted perimeter termed "imo" enables visual field (VF) testing without a fixed head position. Because the positional relationship between the subject's head and the imo is fixed, the effects of head position changes on the test results are small compared with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 9; p. e0185240
Main Authors Yamao, Sayaka, Matsumoto, Chota, Nomoto, Hiroki, Numata, Takuya, Eura, Mariko, Yamashita, Marika, Hashimoto, Shigeki, Okuyama, Sachiko, Kimura, Shinji, Yamanaka, Kenzo, Chiba, Yasutaka, Aihara, Makoto, Shimomura, Yoshikazu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 25.09.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A newly developed head-mounted perimeter termed "imo" enables visual field (VF) testing without a fixed head position. Because the positional relationship between the subject's head and the imo is fixed, the effects of head position changes on the test results are small compared with those obtained using a stationary perimeter. However, only ocular counter-roll (OCR) induced by head tilt might affect VF testing. To quantitatively reveal the effects of head tilt and OCR on the VF test results, we investigated the associations among the head-tilt angle, OCR amplitude and VF testing results. For 20 healthy subjects, we binocularly recorded static OCR (s-OCR) while tilting the subject's head at an arbitrary angle ranging from 0° to 60° rightward or leftward in 10° increments. By monitoring iris patterns, we evaluated the s-OCR amplitude. We also performed blind spot detection while tilting the subject's head by an arbitrary angle ranging from 0° to 50° rightward or leftward in 10° increments to calculate the angle by which the blind spot rotates because of head tilt. The association between s-OCR amplitude and head-tilt angle showed a sinusoidal relationship. In blind spot detection, the blind spot rotated to the opposite direction of the head tilt, and the association between the rotation angle of the blind spot and the head-tilt angle also showed a sinusoidal relationship. The rotation angle of the blind spot was strongly correlated with the s-OCR amplitude (R2≥0.94, p<0.0001). A head tilt greater than 20° with imo causes interference between adjacent test areas. Both the s-OCR amplitude and the rotation angle of the blind spot were correlated with the head-tilt angle by sinusoidal regression. The rotated VF was correlated with the s-OCR amplitude. During perimetry using imo, the change in the subject's head tilt should be limited to 20°.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have the following interests: This study was funded by CREWT Medical Systems. SK and KY are employees of CREWT Medical Systems. SK and KY are directors and have proprietary interests with CREWT Medical Systems. SK and KY have two patents: 1) Binocular random visual field perimeter (Patent No. JP6013887B2) and 2) Prevention of dark adaptation during binocular visual field testing (Patent No. JP5826902B2). CM, SK and KY have the unexamined patent application publication for Correction of eye torsion (Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. JP2016198387). There are no products under development that are relevant to the materials presented in this article. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185240