Fresh whole blood use by forward surgical teams in A fghanistan is associated with improved survival compared to component therapy without platelets
Background In A fghanistan, a substantial portion of resuscitative combat surgery is performed by US A rmy forward surgical teams ( FST s). Red blood cells ( RBC s) and fresh frozen plasma ( FFP ) are available at these facilities, but platelets are not. FST personnel frequently encounter high‐acuit...
Saved in:
Published in | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 53; no. S1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.01.2013
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
In
A
fghanistan, a substantial portion of resuscitative combat surgery is performed by
US A
rmy forward surgical teams (
FST
s). Red blood cells (
RBC
s) and fresh frozen plasma (
FFP
) are available at these facilities, but platelets are not.
FST
personnel frequently encounter high‐acuity patient scenarios without the ability to transfuse platelets. An analysis of the use of fresh whole blood (
FWB
) at
FST
s therefore allows for an evaluation of outcomes associated with this practice.
Study Design and Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed in prospectively collected data from all transfused patients at six
FST
s from
D
ecember 2005 to
D
ecember 2010. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by two separate propensity score analyses. In‐hospital mortality was predicted with the use of a conditional logistic regression model that incorporated these propensity scores. Subset analysis included evaluation of patients who received uncrossmatched
T
ype
O FWB
compared with those who received type‐specific
FWB
.
Results
A total of 488 patients received a blood transfusion. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or
G
lasgow
C
oma
S
cale in those who received or did not receive
FWB
.
I
njury
S
everity
S
cores were higher in patients transfused
FWB
. In our adjusted analyses, patients who received
RBC
s and
FFP
with
FWB
had improved survival compared with those who received
RBC
s and
FFP
without
FWB
. Of 94
FWB
recipients, 46
FWB
recipients (49%) were given uncrossmatched
T
ype
O FWB
, while 48 recipients (51%) received type‐specific
FWB
. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients that received uncrossmatched
T
ype
O
and type‐specific
FWB
.
Conclusions
The use of
FWB
in austere combat environments appears to be safe and is independently associated with improved survival to discharge when compared with resuscitation with
RBC
s and
FFP
alone. Mortality was similar for patients transfused uncrossmatched
T
ype
O
compared with
ABO
type‐specific
FWB
in an austere setting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1132 1537-2995 |
DOI: | 10.1111/trf.12044 |