Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse

Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, Gary Churchill and colleagues provide a high-resolution phylogenetic map of mouse inbred strains based on comparisons to wild-caught mice. They show that the genomes of classical strains are overwhelmingly derived from Mus musculus domesticus whereas wild-derived la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature genetics Vol. 43; no. 7; pp. 648 - 655
Main Authors Churchill, Gary A, de Villena, Fernando Pardo-Manuel, Yang, Hyuna, Wang, Jeremy R, Didion, John P, Buus, Ryan J, Bell, Timothy A, Welsh, Catherine E, Bonhomme, François, Yu, Alex Hon-Tsen, Nachman, Michael W, Pialek, Jaroslav, Tucker, Priscilla, Boursot, Pierre, McMillan, Leonard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.07.2011
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, Gary Churchill and colleagues provide a high-resolution phylogenetic map of mouse inbred strains based on comparisons to wild-caught mice. They show that the genomes of classical strains are overwhelmingly derived from Mus musculus domesticus whereas wild-derived laboratory strains include a broad sampling of diversity from multiple subspecies with pervasive introgression. The subspecific origin, haplotype diversity and identity-by-descent map of laboratory strains can be visualized at http://msub.csbio.unc.edu/PhylogenyTool.html . Here we provide a genome-wide, high-resolution map of the phylogenetic origin of the genome of most extant laboratory mouse inbred strains. Our analysis is based on the genotypes of wild-caught mice from three subspecies of Mus musculus . We show that classical laboratory strains are derived from a few fancy mice with limited haplotype diversity. Their genomes are overwhelmingly Mus musculus domesticus in origin, and the remainder is mostly of Japanese origin. We generated genome-wide haplotype maps based on identity by descent from fancy mice and show that classical inbred strains have limited and non-randomly distributed genetic diversity. In contrast, wild-derived laboratory strains represent a broad sampling of diversity within M. musculus . Intersubspecific introgression is pervasive in these strains, and contamination by laboratory stocks has played a role in this process. The subspecific origin, haplotype diversity and identity by descent maps can be visualized using the Mouse Phylogeny Viewer (see URLs ).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1061-4036
1546-1718
DOI:10.1038/ng.847