Optimal Timing of Delivery among Low-Risk Women with Prior Caesarean Section: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health

To investigate optimal timing of elective repeat caesarean section among low-risk pregnant women with prior caesarean section in a multicountry sample from largely low- and middle-income countries. Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study. Twenty-nine countries from the World Health Organizatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 2; p. e0149091
Main Authors Ganchimeg, Togoobaatar, Nagata, Chie, Vogel, Joshua P, Morisaki, Naho, Pileggi-Castro, Cynthia, Ortiz-Panozo, Eduardo, Jayaratne, Kapila, Mittal, Suneeta, Ota, Erika, Souza, João Paulo, Mori, Rintaro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 11.02.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To investigate optimal timing of elective repeat caesarean section among low-risk pregnant women with prior caesarean section in a multicountry sample from largely low- and middle-income countries. Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study. Twenty-nine countries from the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. 29,647 women with prior caesarean section and no pregnancy complications in their current pregnancy who delivered a term singleton (live birth and stillbirth) at gestational age 37-41 weeks by pre-labour caesarean section, intra-partum caesarean section, or vaginal birth following spontaneous onset of labour. We compared the rate of short-term adverse maternal and newborn outcomes following pre-labour caesarean section at a given gestational age, to those following ongoing pregnancies beyond that gestational age. Severe maternal outcomes, neonatal morbidity, and intra-hospital early neonatal mortality. Odds of neonatal morbidity and intra-hospital early neonatal mortality were 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.60) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.16-0.58) times lower for ongoing pregnancies compared to pre-labour caesarean section at 37 weeks. We did not find any significant change in the risk of severe maternal outcomes between pre-labour caesarean section at a given gestational age and ongoing pregnancies beyond that gestational age. Elective repeat caesarean section at 37 weeks had higher risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality compared to ongoing pregnancy, however risks at later gestational ages did not differ between groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: TG CN JPV NM CPC EOP KJ SM EO JPS RM. Performed the experiments: TG CN JPV NM CPC EOP KJ SM EO JPS RM. Analyzed the data: TG. Wrote the paper: TG CN.
Membership of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network is provided in the Acknowledgments.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149091