Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist

Carl Moons and colleagues provide a checklist and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews of prognostic and diagnostic prediction modelling studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS medicine Vol. 11; no. 10; p. e1001744
Main Authors Moons, Karel G M, de Groot, Joris A H, Bouwmeester, Walter, Vergouwe, Yvonne, Mallett, Susan, Altman, Douglas G, Reitsma, Johannes B, Collins, Gary S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 01.10.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Analysis
Biological models
Breast cancer
Decision Support Techniques
Diabetes
Guidelines and Guidance
Heart surgery
Humans
Medical prognosis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Models, Theoretical
Neural networks
Outcome and process assessment (Health Care)
Validation studies
United Kingdom
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Carl Moons and colleagues provide a checklist and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews of prognostic and diagnostic prediction modelling studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Moons and de Groot contributed equally to this work and are joint first authors.
Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: KGMM JAHdG GSC. Wrote the paper: KGMM JAHdG WB YV SM DGA JBR GSC. ICMJE criteria for authorship read and met: KGMM JAHdG WB YV SM DGA JBR GSC. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: KGMM JAHdG WB YV SM DGA JBR GSC.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1549-1676
1549-1277
1549-1676
DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744