Gender-linked impact of epicardial adipose tissue volume in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery or non-coronary valve surgery

Traditional and non-traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are different between men and women. Gender-linked impact of epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unknown. Gender-linked impact of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 6; p. e0177170
Main Authors Maimaituxun, Gulinu, Shimabukuro, Michio, Salim, Hotimah Masdan, Tabata, Minoru, Yuji, Daisuke, Morimoto, Yoshihisa, Akasaka, Takeshi, Matsuura, Tomomi, Yagi, Shusuke, Fukuda, Daiju, Yamada, Hirotsugu, Soeki, Takeshi, Sugimoto, Takaki, Tanaka, Masashi, Takanashi, Shuichiro, Sata, Masataka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 08.06.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Traditional and non-traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are different between men and women. Gender-linked impact of epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unknown. Gender-linked impact of EATV, abdominal fat distribution and other traditional ASCVD risk factors were compared in 172 patients (men: 115; women: 57) who underwent CABG or non-coronary valvular surgery (non-CABG). In men, EATV, EATV index (EATV/body surface area) and the markers of adiposity such as body mass index, waist circumference and visceral fat area were higher in the CABG group than in the non-CABG group. Traditional ASCVD risk factors were also prevalent in the CABG group. In women, EATV and EATV index were higher in the CABG group, but other adiposity markers were comparable between CABG and non-CABG groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in men, CABG was determined by EATV Index and other ASCVD risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia, adiponectin, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (Corrected R2 = 0.262, p < 0.0001), while in women, type 2 diabetes mellitus is a single strong predictor for CABG, excluding EATV Index (Corrected R2 = 0.266, p = 0.005). Our study found that multiple risk factors, including epicardial adipose tissue volume and traditional ASCVD factors are determinants for CABG in men, but type 2 diabetes mellitus was the sole determinant in women. Gender-specific disparities in risk factors of CABG prompt us to evaluate new diagnostic and treatment strategies and to seek underlying mechanisms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceptualization: M. Shimabukuro M. Sata.Formal analysis: M. Shimabukuro.Funding acquisition: M. Shimabukuro M. Sata.Investigation: GM M. Shimabukuro HMS MT DY YM TA TM SY DF HY T. Soeki T. Sugimoto MT ST M. Sata.Methodology: M. Shimabukuro M. Sata.Project administration: M. Shimabukuro M. Sata.Resources: M. Shimabukuro M. Sata.Validation: M. Shimabukuro.Visualization: M. Shimabukuro.Writing – original draft: M. Shimabukuro.Writing – review & editing: M. Shimabukuro.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0177170