Visual BOLD Response in Late Blind Subjects with Argus II Retinal Prosthesis

Retinal prosthesis technologies require that the visual system downstream of the retinal circuitry be capable of transmitting and elaborating visual signals. We studied the capability of plastic remodeling in late blind subjects implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis with psychophysics and f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS biology Vol. 14; no. 10; p. e1002569
Main Authors Castaldi, E., Cicchini, G. M., Cinelli, L., Biagi, L., Rizzo, S., Morrone, M. C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 25.10.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Retinal prosthesis technologies require that the visual system downstream of the retinal circuitry be capable of transmitting and elaborating visual signals. We studied the capability of plastic remodeling in late blind subjects implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis with psychophysics and functional MRI (fMRI). After surgery, six out of seven retinitis pigmentosa (RP) blind subjects were able to detect high-contrast stimuli using the prosthetic implant. However, direction discrimination to contrast modulated stimuli remained at chance level in all of them. No subject showed any improvement of contrast sensitivity in either eye when not using the Argus II. Before the implant, the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) activity in V1 and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) was very weak or absent. Surprisingly, after prolonged use of Argus II, BOLD responses to visual input were enhanced. This is, to our knowledge, the first study tracking the neural changes of visual areas in patients after retinal implant, revealing a capacity to respond to restored visual input even after years of deprivation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceptualization: MCM EC GMC LB LC SR. Data curation: EC GMC. Formal analysis: MCM EC GMC LB. Funding acquisition: MCM SR. Investigation: MCM EC GMC LB. Methodology: MCM EC GMC LB. Project administration: MCM. Resources: MCM EC GMC LB. Software: EC GMC. Supervision: MCM SR. Validation: MCM EC GMC LB LC. Visualization: EC GMC. Writing – original draft: MCM EC GMC LB LC. Writing – review & editing: MCM EC GMC LB LC.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002569