Evaluation of the Establishment of a Tight Junction in Caco-2 Cell Monolayers Using a Pore Permeation Model Involving Two Different Sizes

The tight junction formation in Caco-2 cell monolayers was compared after 9 and 13 d of culture. Four different sized paracellular markers were simultaneously applied to the apical side of the monolayers. The transepithelial resistance and permeability coefficient of mannitol for the monolayers cult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 163 - 166
Main Authors Seki, Toshinobu, Harada, Sonoko, Hosoya, Osamu, Morimoto, Kazuhiro, Juni, Kazuhiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Japan The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan 01.01.2008
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The tight junction formation in Caco-2 cell monolayers was compared after 9 and 13 d of culture. Four different sized paracellular markers were simultaneously applied to the apical side of the monolayers. The transepithelial resistance and permeability coefficient of mannitol for the monolayers cultured for 13 d were 17.4 and 0.095 times those after 9 d, respectively. The tight junction structure developed during that period. The pore permeation model involving two different sizes was used to quantitatively evaluate the paracellular pathways. The results suggest that there were two-different sized (large and small) pathways in the monolayers cultured for 13 d, while there was only a single large pathway in those cultured for 9 d. The small pathway in the monolayers cultured for 13 d might be a major permeation pathway for the paracellular permeation of urea and the equivalent cylindrical pore radius of the small pathway was less than 0.4 nm, suggesting development of the tight junctions after 13 d.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0918-6158
1347-5215
DOI:10.1248/bpb.31.163