Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms

• Published in: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 37
• Main Authors: Zbinden, Jan, Lendaro, Eva, Ortiz-Catalan, Max
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 28.03.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Agency; Amputation; amputees; Artificial Limbs; Body Image; body ownership; Body representation; brain; Clinical medicine; Codes; Embodied congnition; Embodiment; Engineering; Humans; Implants, Artificial; limb; Neurologi; Neurology; Neurosciences & Neurology; Ownership; Paradigms; Phenomenology; Prostheses; Prosthesis; Prosthetics; Psychological aspects; Psychological research; Rehabilitation; reinnervation; Review; rubber hand illusion; self; sense; stimulation; Systematic review; touch; Sweden; Phenomenology; Ownership; Agency; Body representation; Embodiment; Prosthetics
• ISSN: 1743-0003; 1743-0003
• DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01006-6

The term embodiment has become omnipresent within prosthetics research and is often used as a metric of the progress made in prosthetic technologies, as well as a hallmark for user acceptance. However, despite the frequent use of the term, the concept of prosthetic embodiment is often left undefined or described incongruently, sometimes even within the same article. This terminological ambiguity complicates the comparison of studies using embodiment as a metric of success, which in turn hinders the advancement of prosthetics research. To resolve these terminological ambiguities, we systematically reviewed the used definitions of embodiment in the prosthetics literature. We performed a thematic analysis of the definitions and found that embodiment is often conceptualized in either of two frameworks based on body representations or experimental phenomenology. We concluded that treating prosthetic embodiment within an experimental phenomenological framework as the combination of ownership and agency allows for embodiment to be a quantifiable metric for use in translational research. To provide a common reference and guidance on how to best assess ownership and agency, we conducted a second systematic review, analyzing experiments and measures involving ownership and agency. Together, we highlight a pragmatic definition of prosthetic embodiment as the combination of ownership and agency, and in an accompanying article, we provide a perspective on a multi-dimensional framework for prosthetic embodiment. Here, we concluded by providing recommendations on metrics that allow for outcome comparisons between studies, thereby creating a common reference for further discussions within prosthetics research.