Analysis of a Smartphone-Based Architecture with Multiple Mobility Sensors for Fall Detection

During the last years, many research efforts have been devoted to the definition of Fall Detection Systems (FDSs) that benefit from the inherent computing, communication and sensing capabilities of smartphones. However, employing a smartphone as the unique sensor in a FDS application entails several...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 12; p. e0168069
Main Authors Casilari, Eduardo, Santoyo-Ramón, Jose Antonio, Cano-García, Jose Manuel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 08.12.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:During the last years, many research efforts have been devoted to the definition of Fall Detection Systems (FDSs) that benefit from the inherent computing, communication and sensing capabilities of smartphones. However, employing a smartphone as the unique sensor in a FDS application entails several disadvantages as long as an accurate characterization of the patient's mobility may force to transport this personal device on an unnatural position. This paper presents a smartphone-based architecture for the automatic detection of falls. The system incorporates a set of small sensing motes that can communicate with the smartphone to help in the fall detection decision. The deployed architecture is systematically evaluated in a testbed with experimental users in order to determine the number and positions of the sensors that optimize the effectiveness of the FDS, as well as to assess the most convenient role of the smartphone in the architecture.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Conceptualization: EC.Data curation: JASR EC.Formal analysis: EC JASR.Funding acquisition: EC.Investigation: JASR EC.Methodology: EC.Project administration: EC.Resources: JASR.Software: JASR JMCG.Supervision: EC.Validation: JASR JMCG.Visualization: EC.Writing – original draft: EC.Writing – review & editing: EC JASR JMCG.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168069