Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Diabetics Receiving Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) induces transient episodes of ischemia by the occlusion of blood flow in non-target tissue, before a subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury. When RIPC is applied before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the kidneys may be protected against ischemia-repe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 10; p. e0164256
Main Authors Balbir Singh, Gillian, Ann, Soe Hee, Park, Jongha, Chung, Hyun Chul, Lee, Jong Soo, Kim, Eun-Sook, Choi, Jung Il, Lee, Jiho, Kim, Shin-Jae, Shin, Eun-Seok
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 10.10.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) induces transient episodes of ischemia by the occlusion of blood flow in non-target tissue, before a subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury. When RIPC is applied before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the kidneys may be protected against ischemia-reperfusion injury and subsequently contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RIPC for the prevention of CI-AKI in patients with diabetes with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing elective PCI. This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study enrolled patients with diabetes scheduled for elective PCI with eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or urinary albumin creatinine ratio of >300 mg/g to receive either RIPC or the sham ischemic preconditioning. One hundred and two patients (68.9 ± 8.2 years old, 47.1% men) were included. Baseline eGFR, creatinine and serum NGAL was similar between RIPC and control groups (48.5 ± 12 ml/min vs. 46.6 ± 10 ml/min, p = 0.391; 1.42 ± 0.58 mg/dl vs. 1.41 ± 0.34 mg/dl, p = 0.924; and 136.0 ± 45.0 ng/ml vs. 137.6 ± 43.3 ng/ml, p = 0.961, respectively). CI-AKI occurred in 13.7% (14/102) of the total subjects, with both RIPC and control groups having an equal incidence of 13.7% (7/51). No significant differences were seen in creatinine, NGAL, cardiac enzymes (troponin T, CKMB) and hs-CRP between the groups post-procedure. In this study, RIPC applied prior to elective PCI was not effective in preventing CI-AKI in patients with diabetes with pre-existing CKD. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02329444.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Conceptualization: GBS SHA JP ESS HCC JSL ESK JIC. Data curation: GBS JP ESS. Formal analysis: GBS SHA JP ESS. Investigation: GBS SHA JP HCC JSL ESK JIC SJK ESS. Methodology: ESS JP GBS SHA HCC JSL ESK JLC. Project administration: GBS ESS. Resources: GBS SHA SJK HCC JP JSL ESK JLC. Software: JP HCC JSL. Supervision: ESS JP JL. Validation: JP GBS SHA HCC JSL ESK JIC. Visualization: GBS SHA JP. Writing – original draft: GBS SHA JP ESS. Writing – review & editing: GBS SHA JP ESS JL SJK.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0164256